Camelot Ghana Limited (CMLT.gh) 2019 Abridged Report

first_imgCamelot Ghana Limited (CMLT.gh) listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange under the Paper & Packaging sector has released it’s 2019 abridged results.For more information about Camelot Ghana Limited (CMLT.gh) reports, abridged reports, interim earnings results and earnings presentations, visit the Camelot Ghana Limited (CMLT.gh) company page on AfricanFinancials.Document: Camelot Ghana Limited (CMLT.gh)  2019 abridged results.Company ProfileCamelot Ghana Limited is a security printing company involved in the design, processing, printing and finishing of security print orders, business forms and documents and identity products. The company provides a service to governmental departments, financial institutions and multi-national organisations. Security stationary issued by Camelot Ghana Limited ranges from cheque books and banker’s drafts to share certificates, dividend warrants and lottery tickets. The company produces continuous and cut sheet stationary for insurance company forms, optical character recognition (OCR) forms, pre-prints for laser printers, listing paper and airline boarding passes. Company printing solutions range from magstripe encoded cards to UV cured cards, access control cards and ID cards. Government printing solutions for range from council tax forms to utility billing cards, electoral ballot papers and revenue collection tickets. Subsidiaries of Camelot Ghana Limit offer services ranging from holograms, holosealing, embossed hotfoiling to watermarked cheque paper, chemically-sensitive security paper, solvent sensitive inks, tri-thermochromic inks and microtext printing. Camelot Ghana Limited services governments and institutions in Togo, Burkina Faso, Liberia, Benin, Côte d ´Ivoire, Ethiopia, Sierra Leone and Nigeria. The company headquarters are in Accra, Ghana. Camelot Ghana Limited is listed on the Ghana Stock Exchangelast_img read more

Looking for a passive income? I’d buy the FTSE 100 index

first_imgLooking for a passive income? I’d buy the FTSE 100 index “This Stock Could Be Like Buying Amazon in 1997” I’m sure you’ll agree that’s quite the statement from Motley Fool Co-Founder Tom Gardner.But since our US analyst team first recommended shares in this unique tech stock back in 2016, the value has soared.What’s more, we firmly believe there’s still plenty of upside in its future. In fact, even throughout the current coronavirus crisis, its performance has been beating Wall St expectations.And right now, we’re giving you a chance to discover exactly what has got our analysts all fired up about this niche industry phenomenon, in our FREE special report, A Top US Share From The Motley Fool. Click here to claim your copy now — and we’ll tell you the name of this Top US Share… free of charge! See all posts by Rupert Hargreaves I would like to receive emails from you about product information and offers from The Fool and its business partners. Each of these emails will provide a link to unsubscribe from future emails. More information about how The Fool collects, stores, and handles personal data is available in its Privacy Statement. Simply click below to discover how you can take advantage of this. Image source: Getty Images. center_img Rupert Hargreaves owns no share mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Rupert Hargreaves | Sunday, 1st March, 2020 Enter Your Email Address Our 6 ‘Best Buys Now’ Shares If you’re looking for a passive income stream, the FTSE 100 could help you hit this goal. The FTSE 100 is one of the most income-focused stock indices in the world. It currently supports a dividend yield of nearly 4.7%, which is higher than almost any other developed market stock index. And that’s not the Footsie’s only attractive quality.Global incomeThe leading index’s dividend yield is an aggregation of all of the dividends of its constituents. So, in effect, 100 different companies contribute to the distribution.5G is here – and shares of this ‘sleeping giant’ could be a great way for you to potentially profit!According to one leading industry firm, the 5G boom could create a global industry worth US$12.3 TRILLION out of thin air…And if you click here we’ll show you something that could be key to unlocking 5G’s full potential…This suggests the dividend is also very sustainable. Indeed, for the yield to fall to zero, every member would have to eliminate their payouts. That’s unlikely ever to happen.One or two companies might cut their distributions in a single year, but the diversified nature of the FTSE 100 suggests income investors have plenty of protection.More than 70% of the index’s profits also come from outside the UK. What’s more, there’s not one single sector that has a disproportionate impact on the FTSE 100.This diversification has helped the index navigate some tough times. For example, in 2008, when the banks were in trouble, mining stocks helped support the index. When the miners crashed several years later, consumer goods companies picked up the slack. Now banks are back in vogue (from an income perspective anyway).Income and growthThe FTSE 100’s diversification has also helped the index’s growth, and this should continue. In theory, company earnings should expand inline with inflation at a minimum over the long run.That suggests growth of 2% to 3% per annum over the long run. In theory, this earnings growth should have a knock-on effect on stock prices.On top of this, there’s that 4.7% dividend yield. Added together, these figures suggest investors can look forward to a total return (income and capital growth) of between 6.7% to 7.7% over the long run.These numbers are slightly below the FTSE 100’s historical average. The index has returned approximately 8% per annum since its inception. However, it’s always better to have a margin of safety when trying to estimate long-term market returns.Index fundAnother advantage of using the FTSE 100 to generate a passive income is that it’s straightforward to track the index. There are FTSE 100 tracker funds on the market that currently charge less than 0.1%.All these funds do is track the index, so there’s no risk of the fund manager picking the wrong stocks. It’s also helpful for investors who want to generate a passive income from dividend stocks, as picking income investments can be a tricky process.The power of compoundingIf you own a low-cost FTSE 100 tracker fund, all you need to do is sit back and let the power of compounding do its work.For example, an investment of £20k in a FTSE 100 tracker, with additional contributions of £200 a month, could yield an investment pot of £136k after 15 years. That could be enough to throw off an annual passive income of nearly £8.2k a year, based on the FTSE 100’s current dividend yield of 4.7%.  Renowned stock-picker Mark Rogers and his analyst team at The Motley Fool UK have named 6 shares that they believe UK investors should consider buying NOW.So if you’re looking for more stock ideas to try and best position your portfolio today, then it might be a good day for you. Because we’re offering a full 33% off your first year of membership to our flagship share-tipping service, backed by our ‘no quibbles’ 30-day subscription fee refund guarantee.last_img read more

Easyjet founder pledges half of fortune to charity

first_imgEasyjet founder pledges half of fortune to charity Stelios Haji-Ioannou, the founder of Easyjet, has signed up to the Giving Pledge, promising to give half of his fortune to charity.Haji-Ioannou signed up to the Giving Pledge last month with 13 other individuals and couples from countries including Australia, the US, Slovenia, China, and Norway.In his pledge, Haji-Ioannou said that he would give half of his estate to his foundation, The Stelios Philanthropic Foundation, in addition to spending a ‘fair portion of my annual income on good causes each year and spending about one third of my 60 hour working week managing these charitable projects.’He added:“I have now decided to announce my plans with the help of the Giving Pledge because I think the transparency that comes with the publicity and the scrutiny will achieve two objectives: First it will keep my Foundation and its future trustees disciplined to do good for many generations to come. And second, in the more immediate future, I hope publicising it might inspire others, perhaps those closer to my part of the world to make the same pledge.”The Giving Pledge was created in 2010 by Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet. It aims to encourage the wealthiest individuals and families to give the majority of their wealth to philanthropic causes. So far 168 people have signed the Pledge, representing 21 countries.The new Pledgers include entrepreneurs and business leaders from a range of backgrounds and sectors, including agriculture, finance, gaming and entertainment, travel and leisure, and technology. Advertisement  123 total views,  1 views today Melanie May | 12 June 2017 | News Tagged with: Giving/Philanthropycenter_img AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis14  124 total views,  2 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis14 About Melanie May Melanie May is a journalist and copywriter specialising in writing both for and about the charity and marketing services sectors since 2001. She can be reached via www.thepurplepim.com.last_img read more

Some Farms May Need to Register with FDA

first_img Facebook Twitter The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is making it easier to find answers about the new FDA Facility Registration that begins on October 1st and ends on December 31st. FDA notes all domestic and foreign facilities that manufacture, process, pack or hold food for human or animal consumption in the U.S. are mandated to register as food facilities with FDA. Even those with facilities that are already registered must renew their registrations during the October 1 to December 31 time period of each even-numbered year. Some farms may fall under this requirement. If done on the same day as harvesting – on-farm washing, trimming off outer leaves and cooling produce are considered part of harvesting and would not require classification as a facility. If the harvest is held in storage or warehouse – the farm is considered a facility. Additional information is available on the FDA website. Just click on the Food tab and then follow the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act link and look for the registration link.Source: NAFB News Service SHARE By Andy Eubank – Sep 24, 2012 SHARE Facebook Twitter Home Indiana Agriculture News Some Farms May Need to Register with FDA Some Farms May Need to Register with FDA Previous articlePurdue Extension Leader Reflects on his 5 years in IndianaNext articleHSUS Files Suit and NPPC Calls it a Bullying Tactic Andy Eubanklast_img read more

Human rights organisations filed formal complaints with the OECD against surveillance companies

first_img Receive email alerts February 4, 2013 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Human rights organisations filed formal complaints with the OECD against surveillance companies June 15, 2020 Find out more Reporters Without Borders Germany, Reporters Without Borders International, Privacy International, Bahrain Watch, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights filed formal complaint with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) against a surveillance software company on Friday 1st February. The OECD National Contact Points National Contact Points (NCPs) in the UK is being asked to investigate Gamma International with regards to the company’s potential complicity in serious human rights abuses in Bahrain. A corresponding complaint against Munich-based Trovicor will be filed in Germany on Wednesday 6th February. The complainants argue that there are grounds to investigate whether surveillance products and services provided by Gamma International and Trovicor have facilitated multiple human rights abuses in Bahrain, including arbitrary detention and torture, as well as violations of the right to privacy, freedom of expression and freedom of association. They allege that there is evidence to suggest that information gathered from intercepted phone and internet communications may have been used to detain and torture bloggers, political dissidents and activists and to extract confessions from them. If the complaints are upheld, the companies are therefore likely to be found to be in breach of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, recommendations addressed by governments to companies that set out principles and standards for responsible business conduct.The UK’s NCP is based at the Department for Business Innovation and Skills, and the German NCP is based at the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology. If the NCPs accept the complaints against Gamma and Trovicor, they will then:- investigate the extent of the defendants’ complicity in human rights abuses in Bahrain;- mediate between complainants and defendants;- issue final statements on whether OECD Guidelines have in fact been breached;- provide recommendations to the defendants on how to avoid further breaches; – and follow up in order to ensure that they comply with those recommendations.Eric King, Head of Research at Privacy International, said: «The failure of governments to properly control exports of surveillance technology has left companies like Gamma and Trovicor regulated exclusively by their own moral compasses. Unfortunately, these compasses seem to have malfunctioned and directed companies towards some of the most dangerous and repressive regimes in the world. We very much hope the OECD process will persuade Gamma and Trovicor to take a long hard look at their current and future clients, and to think carefully about the role their products play in the targeting and torture of activists and the suppression of pro-democracy voices.»Christian Mihr, Executive Director of Reporters Without Borders Germany, said: «Unregulated trade with surveillance technologies in authoritarian states is one of the biggest threats to press freedom and human rights work on the internet. Exports of such digital arms have to be made subject to the same restrictions as foreign dealings with traditional arms.»Miriam Saage-Maaß, Vice Legal Director at ECCHR, said: «By maintaining permanent business relations with the state of Bahrain and maintaining their surveillance software, both companies have accepted the risk that they may be accused of abetting torture and other grave human rights violations. If true, such actions would amount to a violation of the OECD Guidelines.»Details of both complaints will be presented at a joint press conference in Berlin on Wednesday 6th February.Press contact:_ Reporter ohne Grenzen (Reporters Without Borders Germany)_ Ulrike Gruska / Christoph Dreyer_ Media relations_ [email protected] _ T: +49 (0)30 60 98 95 33-55 News BahrainMiddle East – North Africa Organisation Help by sharing this information Human rights organisations file formal complaints against surveillance software firms Gamma International and Trovicor with British and German governments. Follow the news on Bahrain German spyware company FinFisher searched by public prosecutors Coronavirus “information heroes” – journalism that saves livescenter_img Related documents [en]Read the OECD complaint summary[fr]Lire le résumé de la plainte (anglais)PDF – 57.75 KB BahrainMiddle East – North Africa News News Tenth anniversary of Bahraini blogger’s arrest to go further October 14, 2020 Find out more March 17, 2021 Find out more News RSF_en last_img read more

Donegal Senator says Health Ministers partial climb down on cuts don’t go far enough

first_img Pinterest Donegal Senator says Health Ministers partial climb down on cuts don’t go far enough Twitter WhatsApp By News Highland – September 6, 2012 Calls for maternity restrictions to be lifted at LUH LUH system challenged by however, work to reduce risk to patients ongoing – Dr Hamilton Facebook A Donegal Senator has said that it is disgraceful that the Government is standing by cuts to home care packages and home help hours for patients with severe disabilities.Yesterday, the HSE chief Tony O’Brien issued a letter confirming the reversal of cuts to personal care assistants.But Senator Ó Domhnaill says the partial climb-down announced yesterday fall far short of the mark.And he said thousands of high-dependency patients will still be unable to get the treatment they need at home….[podcast]http://www.highlandradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/bod.mp3[/podcast] Facebook RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Previous articleGreenfield Home in Strabane under threat of closure once againNext articleLetterkenny General Hospital campus smoking ban to begin next week News Highland center_img Pinterest WhatsApp Guidelines for reopening of hospitality sector published News Twitter Google+ Google+ Almost 10,000 appointments cancelled in Saolta Hospital Group this week Business Matters Ep 45 – Boyd Robinson, Annette Houston & Michael Margey Need for issues with Mica redress scheme to be addressed raised in Seanad alsolast_img read more

Chhattisgarh HC Cancels Summer Vacation for HC & Subordinate Courts [Read Order]

first_imgNews UpdatesChhattisgarh HC Cancels Summer Vacation for HC & Subordinate Courts [Read Order] LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK7 May 2020 5:48 AMShare This – xFollowing the footsteps of other courts in the country, the High Court of Chhattisgarh has cancelled the summer vacation of both the High Court as well as the courts subordinate, so as to compensate for the loss of court work due to the lockdown. An office order intimating the same was issued today by the Registrar General whereby it has been declared that the summer…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginFollowing the footsteps of other courts in the country, the High Court of Chhattisgarh has cancelled the summer vacation of both the High Court as well as the courts subordinate, so as to compensate for the loss of court work due to the lockdown. An office order intimating the same was issued today by the Registrar General whereby it has been declared that the summer vacation scheduled between May 18 and June 12, 2020 stands cancelled. It has been clarified that barring already declared holidays, rest of the days during this period will be treated as working days. Click Here To Download Order Read Order Next Storylast_img read more

[Assault On Constable] Maharashtra’s Women & Child Development Minister Yashomati Thakur Gets 3-Month Jail Term By Maharashtra Court [Read Order]

first_imgNews Updates[Assault On Constable] Maharashtra’s Women & Child Development Minister Yashomati Thakur Gets 3-Month Jail Term By Maharashtra Court [Read Order] Sparsh Upadhyay17 Oct 2020 5:37 AMShare This – xThe Amravati District & Sessions Court (Maharashtra) on Thursday (15th October) sentenced Maharashtra’s Women & Child Development Minister Yashomati Thakur to 3 months rigorous imprisonment in an eight-year-old case of assault on a policeman and also imposed a fine of ₹15,500.The Sessions Judge, Amravati Urmila S. Joshi Phalke held Thakur, her driver (Sagar Suresh Khandekar) and…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe Amravati District & Sessions Court (Maharashtra) on Thursday (15th October) sentenced Maharashtra’s Women & Child Development Minister Yashomati Thakur to 3 months rigorous imprisonment in an eight-year-old case of assault on a policeman and also imposed a fine of ₹15,500.The Sessions Judge, Amravati Urmila S. Joshi Phalke held Thakur, her driver (Sagar Suresh Khandekar) and other two persons (workers Sharad Kashirav Jawanjal and Raju Kisan Ingle) guilty of beating up an on-duty Constable who stopped Thakur’s vehicle on a one-way lane. Case against Yashomati ThakurAccording to the prosecution’s case, on 24/­3/­2012 he (the Complainant/Constable) was attached to traffic branch as a police constable, Amravati.At about 4.15 p.m., one Tata Safari (Yashomati Thakur was present in the vehicle) came from Gadre square and was proceeding from Chuna Bhatti square to Gandhi square (in Amravati).However, Chuna Bhatti square to Gandhi square was declared as one way and, therefore, the on-duty constable restrained the vehicle and told the driver of the vehicle that they cannot proceed from that road.Thereafter, Yashomati Thakur got down from the vehicle, held the Complainant’s collar and slapped him on his cheek.She was followed by the driver (Sagar Suresh Khandekar) and other two persons (workers Sharad Kashirav Jawanjal and Raju Kisan Ingle) travelling in the said vehicle and manhandled him and assaulted him (Constable/Complainant).Subsequently, all these persons proceeded from Chuna Bhatti square to Gandhi square in the said vehicle by violating the traffic rules.The Complainant immediately informed about the said incident to his superior. Thereafter, he approached police station Rajapeth and lodged the report.He alleged that when he was discharging his official duty as a police constable all the accused persons used criminal force on him and deterred him from discharging his official duty.A case was registered under IPC sections 353 (assault on or use of criminal force against a public servant in order to deter him from discharging his duty), 332 (causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty), 186 (obstructing any public servant in discharge of his public functions and 34 (acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) against the four.Court’s AnalysisSessions Judge, Amravati Urmila S. Joshi Phalke examined five witnesses in the case and one of them, a cop, turned hostile during the trial.The Court observed that during the cross-examination, it was tried to assert that the exact spot of the incident had not been brought on the record by the prosecution. Also, the barricades were not broken and therefore, the case of the prosecution falsifies.In this context, the Court remarked,”To ascertain exact spot of the incident it is necessary to see the spot panchanama. The spot panchanama shows that alleged spot of the incident is in front of the temple where the barricades were put. The flex was also exhibited there by the traffic police. Police have also found broken pieces of the button at that place. The informant has shown the said place as the alleged spot of the incident. The Pan stall is also shown towards the western side of the spot of the incident. The map of the spot of the incident also shows that the vehicle came from the Gadre chowk into Chuna Bhatti square and was proceeding towards north towards the Gandhi square. The alleged incident has taken place immediately where the road towards Gandhi square starts. Thus, the contention of the defence that the exact spot of the incident is not proved by the prosecution is not sustainable. The police have seized broken shirt button article 1 from the said spot. Said spot is exactly at the starting point of the road which proceeds towards the Gandhi square. Thus, the alleged incident has taken place when the vehicle was proceeding towards Gandhi square after passing Chuna Bhatti square.” (emphasis supplied)Further, after going through the entire evidence, it appeared to the Court that evidence of informant P.W.1 (Ulhas Raurale/Complainant/Constable) supported by P.W.2 on material particulars, though, P.W.2 declared hostile, mere declaring of hostile is not sufficient to discard his evidence totally. P.W.3 has also supported regarding the presence of police constable at the spot.The Court also observed that there was no reason as to why police constables P.W.1 and P.W.2 should be speaking against the accused persons. There was nothing to show that they had any enmity or grudge against the accused persons. They had immediately lodged the FIR.The Court noted that though P.W.2 left loyalty towards prosecution to the extent of the presence of accused no.1. Admittedly, accused no.1 was MLA and that may be a reason for him not to depose against her. But during the cross-examination by learned APP, he admitted Yashomati Thakur’s presence.In this context, the Court opined”Thus, entire evidence on record is sufficient to show that when P.W.1 was discharging his official duty as a public servant criminal force was used on him by accused no.1 and other accused persons also shared the common intention and deterred him from discharging his official duty as a public servant. Thus, prosecution has proved the charges against the accused persons u/s 353, 332, 186 r/w 34 of IPC. As accused are already held guilty for the offence punishable u/s 353, 332 and 186 r/w section 34 of IPC, no separate punishment is to be awarded for the offence punishable u/s 119 r/w section 117 of IPC.” (emphasis supplied)Importantly the Court opined,”Accused no.1 is a public figure, representative of the public. People elected her. She is also an advocate by profession. She is aware of the legal provisions and the law. The P.W.1 police constable was discharging his official duty. He restrained the vehicle as the road towards the Gandhi chowk was one way. In this situation it was the duty of accused no.1 to follow the rules and regulations.” (emphasis supplied)Further, the Court also said,”It will be the duty of every citizen to respect and citizens cannot be allowed to aggravate the situation by using criminal force against a police constable, who is discharging his official duty to ensure that law and order is maintained.”The Sessions Judge, Amravati Urmila S. Joshi Phalke also directed the city police commissioner to take action against the cop who turned hostile (PW 2).Click Here To Download Order[Read Order]Subscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more

Use Of Slang Like ‘Tom, Dick & Harry’ Not Permissible In Pleadings : Delhi HC Dismisses Petition

first_imgNews UpdatesUse Of Slang Like ‘Tom, Dick & Harry’ Not Permissible In Pleadings : Delhi HC Dismisses Petition Shreya Agarwal3 March 2021 7:21 AMShare This – xThe Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition raising grievances against the functioning of the National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal, for using slang language in the petition draft. Single judge bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh wrote, “The petitioner appears to have drafted the petition on his own. A perusal.. shows that there is slang language in this petition.”The order goes…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition raising grievances against the functioning of the National Company Law Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal, for using slang language in the petition draft. Single judge bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh wrote, “The petitioner appears to have drafted the petition on his own. A perusal.. shows that there is slang language in this petition.”The order goes on to quote the questionable portion as being:”The AA/NCLT cannot permit any person – Tom, Dick and Harry to represent and defend the respondent u/S 7 IBC, as the rules does not permit it.”Dismissing the petition for the use of “Tom, Dick, and Harry” the court said that such language is not permissible in pleadings before the Court, and directed the petitioner a draft a proper petition and then file it.Click here to read/download the order Subscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more

Investigation launched after window smashed at local business

first_img Facebook Google+ Gardai in Letterkenny are investigating an incident of criminal damage at a local business over the weekend. A window was broken at ‘Bookmark’ at Letterkenny Shopping Centre at around 6am on Sunday morning last.No entry was gained to the premises.Any witnesses or anyone with information is being urged to contact Letterkenny Garda Station. Facebook Arranmore progress and potential flagged as population grows WhatsApp Homepage BannerNews Pinterest Important message for people attending LUH’s INR clinic Nine til Noon Show – Listen back to Monday’s Programme Previous articleGardai confirm fire in Dungloe was started maliciouslyNext articleDonegal Garda urges public to comply with Covid travel limit News Highland Google+center_img Twitter DL Debate – 24/05/21 RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Pinterest WhatsApp Twitter News, Sport and Obituaries on Monday May 24th Investigation launched after window smashed at local business Loganair’s new Derry – Liverpool air service takes off from CODA By News Highland – January 12, 2021 last_img read more